Comparative Analysis of Sixty-two Countries Based on Financial Services with A Focus on Pakistan

Authors

  • Ayesha Ashfaq Department of Management Sciences, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Tehmina Fiaz Qazi Hailey College of Banking and Finance, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Bilal Ahmad Hailey College of Banking & Finance, University of the Punjab, Lahore
  • Maryam Abid Department of Management Sciences, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Abdul Basit Lahore Institute of Science and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi Department of Management Sciences, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

The study aims to compare Pakistan's Insurance and financial services with sixty-one selected countries. The study's overall design comprises a literature survey, data acquisition, and analysis. The population under study is all sovereign countries of the world. The sampling design is purposive sampling and the sample size is sixty-two countries. The technique of analysis is Grey Relational Analysis (GRA). Data are acquired from World Development Indicators (WDI), i.e., World Bank's website. The study results show that Libya ranks at first position, Pakistan at the thirty-sixth, and Madagascar at sixty-second position according to financial services (including insurance services). The study is based on an authentic real dataset and the study provides propounding insights to the stakeholders. It also provides food for thought to the policymakers. It contributes country-wise Grey Relational Coefficients, Grades, and Ranks to the literature.  

Keywords: Performance Measurement, Finance, Insurance, Grey Relational Analysis

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Ayesha Ashfaq, Tehmina Fiaz Qazi, Muhammad Bilal Ahmad, Maryam Abid, Abdul Basit, & Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Sixty-two Countries Based on Financial Services with A Focus on Pakistan. Journal of Social Signs Review, 2(4), 656–689. Retrieved from https://socialsignsreivew.com/index.php/12/article/view/66