Analyzing Weak Areas in Governance of Universities in Pakistan: A Case Study of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Sector Universities

Abstract

The governance of higher education institutions in developing nations has garnered increasing attention due to its pivotal role in academic performance and institutional accountability. This study addresses the persistent structural and administrative challenges faced by public sector universities in Pakistan, with a focused examination of institutions in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. The research aims to identify specific weaknesses in governance frameworks that hinder effective decision-making, resource allocation, and stakeholder engagement within these universities. The objective is to assess the scope and depth of governance-related inefficiencies and propose strategic recommendations for improvement. This is achieved through a case study approach, employing a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data are gathered via surveys distributed to administrative staff and faculty, while qualitative insights are extracted from semi-structured interviews with key decision-makers and policy experts in higher education governance. Preliminary findings suggest systemic issues such as lack of autonomy, political interference, limited transparency in financial management, and weak accountability mechanisms. As a whole such problems oppose academic freedom, hinder new ideas and weaken how an institution runs. Moreover, differences in how policies are carried out and in leadership abilities among universities worsen issues in university governance. The report finds that improving governance in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's public universities depends on reforms, improved capacity for university leaders and a shift towards more decentralization and greater involvement of all stakeholders. The study’s output is relevant for talks about changing education in Pakistan and can be used as a model to check public policy problems in such environments.